USPTO serial 74012430
PREFACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 15, 1992
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PREFACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SPINNAKER SOFTWARE CORPORATION
CAMBRIDGE, MA
SOFTWARE PUBLISHING CORPORATION
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
SOFTWARE PUBLISHING CORPORATION
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
SOFTWARE PUBLISHING CORPORATION
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SANDRA E. LUNDY
SANDRA E LUNDY TESTA, HURWITZ & THIBEAULT53 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MENU UTILITY SOFTWARE PROGRAM | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 17, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SPINNAKER SOFTWARE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SOFTWARE PUBLISHING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SOFTWARE PUBLISHING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SOFTWARE PUBLISHING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PREFACE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 10, 1993 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Jan 29, 1993 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Oct 9, 1992 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1992 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 7, 1992 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 13, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1991 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 1991 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 1990 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 22, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1990 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |