USPTO serial 74012589
METZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 19, 1992
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with METZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PARRAMATTA, NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
PARRAMATTA, NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
PARRAMATTA, NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD S. GARDNER
DONALD S GARDNER PRICE, HENEVELD, COOPER, DEWITT & LITTON5740 FOREMOST DR S EP O BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL RESISTANT CEMENTS AND COATING COMPOUNDS; NAMELY, CEMENTS AND ADDITIVES FOR IMPROVING MORTARS FOR BEDDING, GROUTING AND JOINTING TILES AND BRICKS, MASKING COMPOUNDS FOR PREVENTING ABSORPTION OF GROUT INTO TILES, AND CHEMICAL RESISTANT COMPOUNDS FOR PROTECTING AND WATERPROOFING FLOORS, TANKS/VESSELS AND PITS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | CERAMIC TILES USED FOR FLOORING, PAVING AND LINING TANKS, VESSELS AND OTHER STRUCTURES; CEMENTS USED AS COATINGSS ON CONCRETE AND STEEL; MORTARS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 1998 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 19, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 25, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |