Drawing for HOG

USPTO serial 74012766

HOG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MOSKOWITZ SIDNEY I
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FRED WIVIOTT

FRED WIVIOTT MICHAEL, BEST AND FRIEDRICH100 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008FOLDING KNIVES, SPORT KNIVES AND KNIFE CASESABANDONED—
018WALLETS, CREDIT CARD CASES, KEY FOBS, PURSES, LUGGAGE, TOTE BAGS, TRAVEL BAGS AND GARMENT BAGSABANDONED—
021DRINKING STEINS, BEVERAGE GLASSWARE, MUGS, CUPS, INSULATED CAN HOLDERS, LEATHER CAN, GLASS AND MUG HOLDERS, COMMEMORATIVE PLATES, NON-ELECTRIC TOOTHBRUSHES, QUENCHER CUPS, AND FIGURINES MADE OF CERAMIC, PORCELAIN AND GLASSABANDONED—
024FLAGS AND BANNERS NOT OF PAPERABANDONED—
028TOY BALLOONS, SCALE MODEL MOTORCYCLE REPLICAS, TOY CARS, TRUCKS AND MOTORCYCLES, AND INFLATABLE TOY FIGURESABANDONED—
034ASHTRAYS, CIGARETTE LIGHTERS, CIGARETTE CASES, AND HOLDERS FOR CIGARETTE LIGHTERS, NONE OF THE AFORESAID BEING MADE OF PRECIOUS METALABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 1993PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 27, 1992PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 1992EX2MSOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED—
Mar 9, 1992EX2DSOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED—
Oct 31, 1991ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 1991EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 13, 1991EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 27, 1991EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 30, 1990NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 7, 1990PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 10, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 7, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 20, 1990CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 1990CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 9, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance