Drawing for HIBIDENT

USPTO serial 74012947

HIBIDENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODPASTER, SCOTT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIBIDENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. JOHN CAMPAIGN

H JOHN CAMPAIGN GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN & MCCARTHY, PCTHE BAR BLDG36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036-8178

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT, PRESERVATION AND CARE OF THE TEETH, GUMS AND MOUTH; DENTAL GEL AND MOUTHWASHESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 1993ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 17, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 25, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 27, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 12, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 2, 1991ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 2, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 1991REINREINSTATED—
Jan 3, 1991ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 23, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance