USPTO serial 74013381
DUR-X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1734161Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 17, 1992
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DUR-X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DURA-MED EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
NEW CASTLE, DE
DURA-MED EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
NEW CASTLE, DE
DURA-MED EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
NEW CASTLE, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELOISE L. MORGAN
ELOISE L MORGAN WINTHROP, STIMSON, PUTNAM & ROBERTSONE BATTERY PARK PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004-1490UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RETAIL OUTLET AND DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF MEDICAL AIDS, HOME HEALTH CARE SUPPLIES AND DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT; CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF MEDICAL EQUIPMENT AND MEDICAL AIDS; AND, HOME HEALTH CARE ASSISTANCE IN THE OPERATION OF DIFFERENT MEDICAL EQUIPMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DURA-MED EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DURA-MED EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DURA-MED EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DUR-X
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 17, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 12, 1992 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 1992 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 8, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 8, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |