USPTO serial 74013389
DD DOLBY S NR HX PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUDGE, CONNIE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DD DOLBY S NR HX PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE W. SCHWAB
BRUCE W SCHWAB TOWNSEND AND TOWNSENDSTEWART ST TWR 20TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | audio and video tape recorders and tape players for portable, non-portable and/or in-vehicle use; products for portable, non-portable and/or in-vehicle use; comprising audio and/or video tape recorders and/or tape players and at least one of the following: amplifier, receiver, radio or TV tuner, record player, CD player, video monitor, loudspeaker; noise reduction units; video tapes recorded with signals encoded for playback using a noise reduction system; and video tape that have been recorded using a headroom extension process | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DD DOLBY S NR HX PRO
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 1993 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 1993 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1993 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 23, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 1992 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |