USPTO serial 74013393
SWEETELLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 17, 1993
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SWEETELLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SCARBOROUGH, ONTARIO, CA
SCARBOROUGH, ONTARIO, CA
SCARBOROUGH, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GERALD S. SCHUR
GERALD S SCHUR WELSH & KATZ, LTDSTE 1625, 135 S LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ARTIFICIAL SWEETENER | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 15, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2000 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 17, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 25, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |