USPTO serial 74013907
HAYQED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HAYQED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WALTER J. BLENKO JR
WALTER J BLENKO JR ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT1700 MARKET ST STE 3232PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF OCCUPATIONAL EVALUATION BY MEANS OF INTEGRATION OF PERSONAL ANALYSIS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER MANUALS | ABANDONED | Feb 2, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 1991 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1990 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |