USPTO serial 74014126
VALUECARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, CHERYL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VALUECARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vernon F. Hauschild
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATIONONE FINANCIAL PLZHARTFORD, CT 06101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | management services in the field of health care cost control for employers who independently provide health care insurance to their employees, namely, establishing and maintaining a network of quality health care providers who are approved for use by employees under their health care insurance and developing standards with these health care providers for efficient, cost effective health care delivery | ABANDONED | Mar 26, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1990 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 4, 1990 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |