USPTO serial 74014352
COREX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES, CARYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COREX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert Dubno
THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS, PC5676 RIVEERDALE AVEBOX 900NEW YORK, NY 10471-0900Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical preparations for improving the function of electrical contacts in motor vehicles by removing humidity | ABANDONED | — |
| 002 | rust preventative mixtures based on natural oils for use on industrial machines and motor vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
| 003 | rust remover preparations for use on industrial machines and motor vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
| 004 | lubricants, namely oil, and grease, for use on automobiles and industrial machines | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |