Drawing for MORTON'S OF CHICAGO

USPTO serial 74014514

MORTON'S OF CHICAGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1647095Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 4, 1991
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with MORTON'S OF CHICAGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HAROLD V STETLAND

Harold V. Stotland Fleckman & McGlynnP.O. Box 685108William D. RamanAustin, TX 78768-5108

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042restaurant servicesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2017NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Oct 26, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 22, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
May 14, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 2, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 8, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 29, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 30, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 3, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 26, 2001RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 26, 200189AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
May 31, 200189AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Sep 29, 1996C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 1, 1996815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 4, 1991R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 12, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 1990CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance