USPTO serial 74015047
SIENNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIENNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pennsauken, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John F. A. Earley
HARDING, EARLEY, FOLLMER & FRAILEY 86 THE COMMONS AT VALLEY FORGE E1388 VALLEY FORGE RDP O BOX 750VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0750Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Women's Shoes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 1993 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 24, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 24, 1993 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 13, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 12, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 14, 1991 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |