USPTO serial 74015067
TOTAL RECALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOTAL RECALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Barrett
ROBERT M BARRETT BARRETT & ZIPSER2121 AVE OF THE STARSSTE 1700LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-5012Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | motion picture film and video tape (pre-recorded celluloid film and pre-recorded video tape featuring entertainment), and phonograph records | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1993 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 15, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 19, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 1991 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1990 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |