USPTO serial 74015088
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gene S. Winter
GENE S WINTERST ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON AND REENS986 BEDFORD STSTAMFORD, CT 06905| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business consulting services in the field of sports promotion, namely, promoting the services of others by arranging for sponsors to affiliate their goods and services for sporting events; marketing services, namely, developing broadcast media strategy for sportig events for others, consulting in the placing of sports events o television, consuting i the creation of home videos and highlight video tapes, consulting regarding rights fees with television networks and stations and creation syndicated television networks; consultng in the creation of effective sales materials, consulting with regard to the sales of corporate sponsorship, and consulting to others concerning the production of telecasts | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |