USPTO serial 74015179
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph R. Marcus
JOSEPH R MARCUS MARCUS, WELSH & KATZ, LTD135 S LASALLE STSTE 1625CHICAGO, IL 60603| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | electronic communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data in the field of international commercial banking | ABANDONED | Jun 26, 1989 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |