Drawing for AUTOMATIC BALANCING SYSTEM

USPTO serial 74015191

AUTOMATIC BALANCING SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUTOMATIC BALANCING SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jess M. Collen

JESS M COLLEN SCARBOROUGH STATIONMCGLEW AND TUTTLE, PCSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-0827UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011control panels for use in connection with heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systemsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 3, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 10, 1993CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 20, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 6, 1993ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 2, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 1, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 7, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance