USPTO serial 74015569
IGLOO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IGLOO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Ray Riley
J RAY RILEYW U PLZ6213 EDLOE STHOUSTON, TX 77005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | thermoelectric coolers and warmers for food and beverages and alternating/direct electrical current converters | ABANDONED | Jul 30, 1987 |
| 021 | portable containers for ice, food and other uses, and accessories therefor; namely, ice chests, beverage coolers, picnic jugs, beverage holders, water coolers, car coolers; domestic utility containers; namely, water containers, fuel containers and waste containers; ice substitutes; namely, sealed plastic containers containing refreezable gels and freeze bottle freezable containers | ABANDONED | Jul 30, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 1992 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 18, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 17, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 27, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 27, 1991 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 8, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |