USPTO serial 74016185
NIEMETZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 18, 1991
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NIEMETZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
5302 Henndorf, AT
PATISSERIE FRANCHISE ESTABLISHMENT VADUZ
HERRENGASSE 21, LI
Other trademarks owned by PATISSERIE FRANCHISE ESTABLISHMENT VADUZ
F-58000 Nevers, FR
5302 Henndorf, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Apolzon
WALTER NIEMETZ E S & NIEMETZ PATISSERIECHEMIN DES HAUTS MONTS 19ANIERES, 1247SWITZERLANDGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | frozen [ and non-frozen ] confections, namely, cakes and pastries | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Niemetz, Walter
- Other trademarks owned by PATISSERIE FRANCHISE ESTABLISHMENT VADUZ
- Other trademarks owned by Niemetz, Walter
- Other trademarks owned by Niemetz, Walter
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named NIEMETZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2003 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2003 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 13, 2001 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1996 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 17, 1996 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 26, 1992 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 26, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |