USPTO serial 74017357
STONGARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STONGARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MAPLE SHADE, NJ
Maple Shade, NJ
Maple Shade, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles N. Quinn
CHARLES N QUINN DANN, DORFMAN, HERRELL AND SKILLMAN1601 MARKET ST STE 720PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2307UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | rust converting and stabilizing coatings in the nature of chemicals and polymer based latex liquids in the nature of chemical coatings, all for use in industrial, commercial and highway applications on masonry and concrete | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1988 |
| 019 | cementitious and bituminous coatings for use on masonry and concrete in industrial, commercial and highway applications; and aggregates as building materials consisting of blends of fine silica (sand), cement and admixtures | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 5, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 1998 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |