USPTO serial 74018028
TVP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TVP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melville Owen
MELVILLE OWEN OWEN WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, PC455 MARKET ST19TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | exposed camera films; photographic slide transparencies; phonograph records; sound recordings featuring music; prerecorded videos featuring music; blank audio tapes; blank video tapes; sound reproducing and recording machines, namely, audio tape players and recorders, television sets, cd players, record players, 35 mm cameras and video cameras | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 2, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 12, 1992 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 12, 1992 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 2, 1991 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1991 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 20, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |