USPTO serial 74019427
PUREDATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 20, 1992
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PUREDATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA
Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA
Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sidney Wynton Semple
SIDNEY WYNTON SEMPLE ZAMMIT, DASH & SEMPLE130 BLOOR ST WSTE 601TORONTO, ON M5S 1N5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware, computer firm ware and computer software for use in local area and wide area networks and active and passive hubs for use in local area and wide area networks together with manuals sold with such goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1989 |
| 042 | custom design and development of computer software, modification of computer software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 1991 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 14, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |