USPTO serial 74019783
COLD FUSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COLD FUSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Arctica Distilling Corporation
Vancouver, B. C. Canada, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel P. Chernoff
DANIEL P CHERNOFF MESSRS. CHERNOFF, VILHAUER, ET AL600 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN PLZONE SW COLUMBIAPORTLAND, OR 97258Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | NOVELTY BEAKERS FOR USE AS BEVERAGE CONTAINERS | ABANDONED | Aug 30, 1989 |
| 032 | NON-ALCOHOLIC CIDER AND SOFT DRINKS, DRINK MIX PRODUCTS-NAMELY CONCENTRATES FOR A VODKA BASED DRINKS | ABANDONED | Aug 16, 1989 |
| 033 | DISTILLED ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES-NAMELY VODKA AND ALCOHOLIC COCKTAILS | ABANDONED | Aug 16, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |