USPTO serial 74019913
ULTRA MAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODPASTER, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTRA MAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HAROLD I. KAPLAN
HAROLD I KAPLAN BLUM KAPLAN1120 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Indo-American Design Workshop, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Indo-American Design Workshop, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ULTRA MAN
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 16, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 20, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 1992 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |