USPTO serial 74020235
THINK GREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THINK GREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Westlake, OH
Westlake, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas E. Young
THOMAS E YOUNG BODY, VICKERS & DANIELSTWENTIETH FL TERMINAL TWRCLEVELAND, OH 44113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | mailing and shipping cardboard boxes, padded envelopes, photo mailers, wrapping paper, tissue paper, paper labels, and adhesive tape for household use | ABANDONED | Nov 26, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 30, 1992 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 30, 1992 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 12, 1992 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 26, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 1991 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 15, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1990 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 23, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |