USPTO serial 74021611
CREPE DE CHINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CREPE DE CHINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fred Wittenstein
FRED WITTENSTEIN WITTRICH LTD226 E 54TH STNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfume, cologne, toilet water, face cream, face powder, talcum powder, eau de toilette, rouge, lipstick, bath salts, toilet soap, shampoo, hair care preparations, brilliantine, bath and body preparations, skin creams, toners and lotions, sachets | ABANDONED | Jan 24, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 9, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 23, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 23, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1993 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |