USPTO serial 74021703
FUELEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1795617Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 28, 1993
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FUELEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fluid Conditioners Corporation
Beverly Hills, CA
Fluid Conditioners Corporation
Beverly Hills, CA
Fluid Conditioners Corporation
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morland C. Fischer
MORLAND C FISCHER660 NEWPORT CTR DRSTE 460NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | magnetically operated fuel conditioners for gasoline and diesel driven engines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 27, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fluid Conditioners Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Fluid Conditioners Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Fluid Conditioners Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named FUELEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2000 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 28, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 26, 1993 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1993 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 24, 1992 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1992 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 1992 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 7, 1991 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 1991 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| May 5, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 5, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1990 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |