Drawing for NOVACHIP

USPTO serial 74022321

NOVACHIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1759175Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 16, 1993
Examiner
—
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with NOVACHIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Handelsman

Jeffrey H. Handelsman Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019non-metallic building materials; namely, chip sealing aggregates, surface dressing made of asphalt and bitumen, wearing course, overlay, floors; asphalt, pitch and bitumen asphaltACTIVEOct 1, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2023NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 19, 2023RNL3REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 19, 202389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Sep 15, 2023PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Aug 22, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 6, 2023E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2022REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2019COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2013NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2013RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Mar 15, 201389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Mar 14, 2013E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 24, 2004RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 24, 200489AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Mar 29, 2004PR89RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9—
Jul 11, 200389AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Jul 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2003PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Mar 9, 2000C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 26, 1999PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Mar 16, 1999815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 16, 1993R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 15, 1993CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jan 15, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 1993SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 1, 1992IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 23, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 31, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 28, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 8, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance