USPTO serial 74022792
CRESCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODPASTER, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRESCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Minesing, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL D. FISHMAN
MICHAEL D FISHMAN DYKEMA GOSSETT1577 N WOODWARD AVESTE 300BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-2820Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | adhesives; glues; epoxies for use in automotive repair; emblem and molding adhesives; windsheild preparation, namely, pinchweld primers; solution to suppress brake squeal; silicone for making gaskets; spray adhesives; liquid adhesives; trim cements; additives for curing paint; solvents; all purpose silicone aerosols; viscosity silicone aerosols; liquid rubbers; and hot solvents; all for use in the automotive industry | ABANDONED | — |
| 002 | coatings in the nature of paints; automobile coatings; engine enamels; bumper coatings; lacquer based paints; rubber coatings; spray lacquers; spray undercoatings; paint bases; paint primers; protective coatings for battery terminal and belts; coatings in the nature of aerosol powders; spray paints; and aerosol paints; all for use in the automotive industry | ABANDONED | — |
| 003 | solvent cleaners; battery terminal cleaners; brake cleaners; jet blast carburetor and choke cleaners; solvent cleaners for carburetors and chokes; hand cleaners, appearance/reconditioning products, namely, solvent upholstery cleaners; solvents for stripping paint, paint gaskets, decals and adhesives; glass cleaners; motor cleaners; appearance conditioners for vinyl; vinyl plastic cleaners; and tire cleaning solutions and conditioners, all for use in the automotive industry | ABANDONED | — |
| 004 | dry lubricants; all purpose lubricants; silicone paste lubricants; white grease; brake lubricants; and aerosol lubricants; all for use in automotive industry rust penetrants | ABANDONED | — |
| 008 | sealant cutters; sealant cutter blades; glass chisels; mirror tools; manually operated glass removing tool, namely music wires; tools for removing moldings; urethane removal tools; cartridge guns; hand operated spray guns for applying coatings; razor blades; and holders; all for use in the automotive industry | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | sealers; seam sealers; joint sealers; pumpable sealers; rubber seam sealers; glass sealers; automobile bedding sealers; butyl tapes; butyl resealants; glass seals; glass setting tapes; adhesive molding tapes; insulating foam; rubber shim stock; PVC sealing tapes for air conditioning and electrical applications; all purpose tapes; PVC carton sealing tapes; strapping tapes; waterroof cloth tapes; strip caulkings; windshield plastic sticks; and RTV silicone sealants all for use in the automotive industry | ABANDONED | — |
| 019 | strip caulkings and windshield plastic sticks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Crescent Chemical Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named CRESCO
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 26, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1990 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| May 3, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |