USPTO serial 74022923
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Hunt Valley, MD
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LYNDA E. ROESCH
LYNDA E ROESCH DINSMORE AND SHOHL1900 CHEMED CTR255 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics, namely, eye make-up | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 1994 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 14, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 2, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |