USPTO serial 74023459
ULTRA THIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GREGORY, SLOAN B.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTRA THIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan B. Samlan
ALAN B SAMLAN FOX &GROVER, CHARTERED233 S WACKER DR STE 7818CHICAGO, IL 60606-6404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | meal replacement powder for dietary use | ABANDONED | May 18, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1990 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 27, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1990 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 20, 1990 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 11, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |