USPTO serial 74023489
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Ohta-Ku, Tokyo, JP
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | office equipment, namely-copiers, facsimle machines, computers, and printers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |