USPTO serial 74023683
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
London, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Law Company, The
DAVID GOLDBERG COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, PC605 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10158UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of a musical performing and recording group | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |