USPTO serial 74023696
LAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CONN, WILLIAM A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Phoenixville, PA
Phoenixville, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl L. Spivak
KARL L SPIVAK ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT1700 MARKET STSTE 3232PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | equipment for playing lacrosse, namely, sticks, balls and protective coverings for wear by players | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 1992 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 1, 1992 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jun 1, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 1992 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 28, 1991 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 1991 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 26, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1990 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |