USPTO serial 74023723
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Dallas, TX
Dallas, TX
Dallas, TX
TEMPLE, TX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL C. MASON
MICHAEL C MASON KING & SPALDING191 PEACHTREE STATLANTA, GA 30303UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | processed fruits and vegetables; meat; chicken; fish; dairy based food beverages; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; mayonnaise; and pickles, all goods distributed at wholesale, to restaurants, fast food stores and to other retail stores, other than convenience stores | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | sauces, ketchup, mustard, and relish distributed to restaurants, fast food stores and to other retail stores, other than convenience stores | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2004 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 25, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 26, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 7, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 28, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 23, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1992 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 27, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |