USPTO serial 74023926
INFINITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INFINITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Scarsdale, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank J. Colucci
BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVEN FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | cookware; namely, roasting pans, stock pots, cookware sets consisting of sauce pans, pots and skillets, tea kettles, colanders, mixing bowls; bakeware; namely, loaf pans, cake pans, pie pans and muffin pans | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |