USPTO serial 74024330
PHANTOM CLASSIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1711801Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 1, 1992
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHANTOM CLASSIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Greenville, SC
LEATHERHEAD, SURREY KT22 7LW, GB
Greenville, SC
Greenville, SC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W. SACOFF
ROBERT W SACOFF PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, ET AL470 WATERGATE SIX HUNDREDWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | tennis shoes sold exclusively in tennis pro and tennis specialty shops | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Mar 28, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dunlop Slazenger Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by SLAZENGERS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Dunlop Slazenger Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Dunlop Slazenger Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named PHANTOM CLASSIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 1995 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jul 6, 1995 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 20, 1995 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 28, 1994 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1994 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 1993 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 1, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 9, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1990 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 6, 1990 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 22, 1990 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1990 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |