USPTO serial 74025724
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert T. Orner
ROBERT T ORNER GTE SERVICE CORPORATIONONE STAMFORD FORUMSTAMFORD, CT 06904UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | telephone directories | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 1990 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1990 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1990 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 2, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |