USPTO serial 74026405
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
GLENDALE PROTECTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Woodbury, Long Island, NY
Other trademarks owned by GLENDALE PROTECTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
GLENDALE PROTECTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Woodbury, Long Island, NY
Other trademarks owned by GLENDALE PROTECTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
GLENDALE PROTECTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Woodbury, Long Island, NY
Other trademarks owned by GLENDALE PROTECTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Garland C. Boothe, Jr.
NEIL F GREENBLUM AND BRUCE H BERNSTEIN GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN, PLC1950 ROLAND CLARKE PLRESTON, VA 20191UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | safety spectacles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 17, 1990 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 1998 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 13, 1991 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 1991 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 4, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1991 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 27, 1991 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1990 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |