Drawing for GREEN GOURMET

USPTO serial 74026639

GREEN GOURMET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWE, ROBERT J.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREEN GOURMET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah Schavey Ruff

DEBORAH SCHAVEY RUFF NEWMAN, WILLIAMS, ANDERSON & OLSON77 W WASHINGTON STCHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029peanut butter; vegetable oil; vegetable oil cooking spray; mayonnaise; margarine; raisins; salad dressings; spreads and dips having a yogurt base; butter; yogurt; cheese; cream cheese; soups; chili; fruit-based pie filling; and frozen entrees consisting primarily of meat, poultry, or fishABANDONED—
030breakfest cereal; coffee; spaghetti sauce; popped popcorn; rice cakes; crackers; bean chips; vinegar; wheat germ and wheat bran other than a dietary supplement; frozen entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; biscuits; and wafflesABANDONED—
031pet food and dog biscuitsABANDONED—
032bottled drinking water and fruit juicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 1992ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 15, 1992CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 3, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 6, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 25, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 9, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance