Drawing for MODUS

USPTO serial 74026710

MODUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1727019Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 27, 1992
Examiner
COLE RICHARD G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MODUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Franklin Rothwell

G FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & KURZ, PC555 13TH ST NW STE 701 EWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007products for non-land vehicles; namely, brake linings for industrial machines, brakes for industrial machines, brushes being parts of motors, generators and dynamos, carburetors for internal combustion engines, ignition parts for internal combustion engines; namely, condensers, fuel injectors for internal combustion engines, piston rings and pistons for internal combustion engines, and engines for non-land vehiclesSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—
009fire engines and fire extinguishing apparatusSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—
012brakes for motor vehicles, emission reduction units for land vehicles; namely, EGR valves, engines for land vehicles, land vehicle parts; namely, fan belts, oil pumps and water pumps, oil, gas and air filters for motor vehicles, motor vehicles; namely, cars, trucks, vans and utility vehicles, radiators for motor vehicles, oil pumps for motor vehicles, starters for motor vehicles, cargo and camping trailers, trucks and structural parts thereof and vans and structural parts thereofSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 1996C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Oct 7, 1996CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 6, 1996CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Mar 15, 1996PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 27, 1992R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 4, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 27, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 31, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 16, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 14, 1991ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 7, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance