USPTO serial 74027297
BUTTERKIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUTTERKIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Faversham, Kent, ME13-8BQ, GB
London E7 8AH, GB
Faversham, Kent, ME13 8BQ, GB
Faversham, Kent, ME13-8BQ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Grandinetti
PAUL GRANDINETTI LEVY, ZITO & GRANDINETTI1910 K ST NW STE 411WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies; jams; milk; edible oils and fats; salad dressings; and fruit preserves | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | rice, tapioca, sago, flour, processed cereals, bread, flavored ices, honey, yeast, baking powder, salt, mustard, vinegar, sauces, spices, ice, cakes, cookies, croissants, crackers, biscuits, candy, and chocolates | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | fresh fruits, fresh vegetables, live plants and flowers, animal foodstuffs, malt extracts and raw popcorn | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BUTTERKIST LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by BARD BROTHER LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by PACKAGED FOODS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by BUTTERKIST LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named BUTTERKIST
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 28, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 22, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |