Drawing for TIFFANY LUNETTES

USPTO serial 74027497

TIFFANY LUNETTES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIFFANY LUNETTES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin W. Schiffmiller

MARTIN W SCHIFFMILLER KIRSCHSTEIN, OTTINGER, ET AL551 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10176-0024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009EYEGLASSES AND EYEGLASS LENSESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 28, 1992EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 27, 1992ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 17, 1992CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 26, 1991JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 15, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 1991EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 6, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance