USPTO serial 74027560
MAGNETA-PORTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUBEL, ELLEN A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAGNETA-PORTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Magneta-Porta Handelsgesellschaft fuer Industrie-Schiebetuerenzubehoer MBH
Kauzchenweg, DE
Other trademarks owned by Magneta-Porta Handelsgesellschaft fuer Industrie-Schiebetuerenzubehoer MBH
Magneta-Porta Handelsgesellschaft fuer Industrie-Schiebetuerenzubehoer MBH
Kauzchenweg, DE
Other trademarks owned by Magneta-Porta Handelsgesellschaft fuer Industrie-Schiebetuerenzubehoer MBH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jon A. Lehman
CECILIA J KOCHANOWSKI WALTER, CONSTON, ALEXANDER & GREEN, PC90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-1387UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | suspension and conveyor systems for movable loads, in particular as components of elevators for the transportation of passengers and loads and for moving doors and gates at buildings and containers, the systems being composed of motors, magnets, guiding and supporting rails, guiding rollers and motor controllers | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | motors for land vehicles with the exception of internal combustion engines | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Magneta-Porta Handelsgesellschaft fuer Industrie-Schiebetuerenzubehoer MBH
- Other trademarks owned by Magneta-Porta Handelsgesellschaft fuer Industrie-Schiebetuerenzubehoer MBH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named MAGNETA-PORTA
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 1993 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 1993 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 1992 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1991 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 27, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |