Drawing for CALLTERNATIVES

USPTO serial 74027986

CALLTERNATIVES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1776051Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 8, 1993
Examiner
POMPEY, TINA
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CALLTERNATIVES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ned W. Branthover

NED W BRANTHOVER MORGAN & FINNEGAN345 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10154UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services; namely, conducting seminars in the field of telecommunication servicesEXPIREDJan 31, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2006CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jun 7, 1999815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 8, 1993R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 16, 1993CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Apr 2, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 9, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 1991SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 7, 1991IURFIU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 1991IUFFUSE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES—
Sep 23, 1991IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 23, 1991NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 30, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 3, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 28, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance