USPTO serial 74028638
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Richey
SUSAN M RICHEY RIORDAN & MCKINZIECALIFORNIA PLZ300 S GRAND AVE 29TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90071| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | dip mixes, toppings for use with vegetables, consisting of bacon bits, dehydrated vegetables and flavorings, dried fruit, cole slaw mix, fruit glaze and fruit-based pie filling mix | ABANDONED | Nov 18, 1983 |
| 030 | bread crumbs, stuffing, breading and batter mixes, croutons, crackers, trail mix, snack food consisting of pretzels, rice crackers, sesame crackers, corn chips, peanuts, and croutons | ABANDONED | Nov 18, 1983 |
| 032 | fruit drink mixes | ABANDONED | Nov 18, 1983 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 6, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 31, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |