USPTO serial 74028951
AQUATEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AQUATEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ville de Laval, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pierre Lesperance
PIERRE LESPERACE1440 ST CATHERINE ST WSTE 707MONTREAL, QC H3G 1R8Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | soaps, moisturizing creams and milks; tonics, cosmetics | ABANDONED | — |
| 029 | decoctions, food additives enclosed in capsules | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | spring water | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | balneotherapy, health spa services, hydrotherapy, salt water and sea-air therapy services; catering services; hotel services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |