Drawing for ALBERTO'S

USPTO serial 74029025

ALBERTO'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALBERTO'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel W. McDonald

DANIEL W MCDONALD MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH, EDELL, ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030gnocchis and pastas including egg noodles and rigatoniABANDONEDMar 29, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 11, 1992ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 11, 1992EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 18, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 23, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance