Drawing for CANADIAN CARDIOVASCULAR

USPTO serial 74029057

CANADIAN CARDIOVASCULAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANADIAN CARDIOVASCULAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James W. McKee

JAMES W MCKEE FAY, SHARPE, BEALL, FAGAN, ET AL1100 SUPERIOR AVESTE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in the medical fieldABANDONED—
010implantable medical devices, namely, heart valves and grafts; external medical devices, namely, cardiac monitoring equipment; disposable medical devices, namely, catheters, needles and transducers; and reusable medical devices, namely, heart valve sizers, surgical clamps, reservoirs, oxygenators, transducers and forcepsABANDONED—
042computer programming servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 1992ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 16, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance