Drawing for DHI

USPTO serial 74029207

DHI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCLEOD, LINDA K.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DHI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia F. Reaves

CYNTHIA F REAVES EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, PC1227 25TH ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042providing the following services for payers of health care (self-insured groups or insurers); processing health care claims, conducting utilization reviews of health care services, contracting with health care providers on behalf of payors, and providing general administrative services for such payersABANDONEDFeb 17, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 1992PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 3, 1992PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 1992ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 24, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance