USPTO serial 74029230
MOBILE CAR CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCLEOD, LINDA K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOBILE CAR CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard D. Fladung
RICHARD D FLADUNG PRAVEL, HEWITT, KIMBALL & KRIEGER1177 W LOOP S 10TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77027-9095UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | emergency road vehicle repair services | ABANDONED | Oct 17, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 26, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 19, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |